Thinking

Why Cracker Barrel’s rebranding mistake is so instructive

I once stopped at a Cracker Barrel in Lakeland, Florida, while traveling with my daughter. On that trip, I also helped her buy a vintage Volkswagen Beetle convertible.

What I remember about Cracker Barrel is not the food, it was the feeling, the porch, the rocking chairs, the country store, the walls full of objects. To me, it felt like a sanctuary of better days and older times. That is why Cracker Barrel’s rebranding mistake is so instructive.

The company saw an aging brand, dated interiors and weak traffic and reached the conventional conclusion: Modernize it. Simplify the logo. Brighten the stores. Remove the clutter. Make the brand feel younger.Perfectly logical. And wrong.

Most rebranding projects begin with the familiar analysis: Customers, consumers, competitors, the brand. Throw in a bit of cultural analysis or semiotics, trends or whatever. Segmentation, and then focus on younger consumers.

Demand landscaping starts earlier. It is the methodology that helps us understand how demand forms in people’s lives and then leads us to define the demand spaces a brand can serve.

For Cracker Barrel, those demand spaces were not simply “casual dining.” They included: A familiar stop on a long road trip (me with my first-born daughter cherishing the years of her growing up), a place where generations could feel comfortable together, a reassuring version of home, an escape from polished, interchangeable restaurant chains, a sanctuary of old times.

The redesign treated the oldness as decoration. Something to change and modernize. For many customers, the oldness was part of the value. Cracker Barrel did need modernization. Better food, better service, cleaner stores, shorter waits, more consistent execution. But it did not need cultural sterilization!!

The right question was never: How do we make Cracker Barrel look more contemporary? It was: Which parts of the experience are outdated and dysfunctional, and which parts create the demand people come for?

Cracker Barrel thought the oldness was the problem. Demand landscaping would have shown that some of the oldness was the reason people came.